Thursday, 10 May 2012


Cabinet has tonight (Thursday 10 May) confirmed its support for Manston Airport, but recommended that Thanet District Council should not support the introduction of scheduled night-time flying as outlined in the airport’s proposal document.

Members felt that the potential noise and environmental impacts, as well as strong public feeling against the airport’s proposals, meant it could not support scheduled night-time flying between 23.00 and 7.00.

Cabinet were considering the council’s draft consultation response to Manston Aiport, which will now go to Full Council for final debate on Thursday 24 May.

As well as underestimating the potential negative impacts, Cabinet felt that the proposals overestimated the potential economic benefits, overstated the potential number of jobs and did not consider the detrimental impact of night time flying on Thanet’s recovering Tourism Industry.

Attention was also drawn to the World Health Organisation’s assessment of the impacts of disturbed sleep, to Article 8 of the Human Right’s Act and to the Habitats Regulations which would need the airport to address whether the proposed policy constitutes a ‘plan or project’.

The draft response on the proposed night-time flying policy has now been to the Airport Working Party and the Overview & Scrutiny Committee. Here a number of amendments were made in relation to the World Health Organisation’s assessment of the impacts of disturbed sleep, deficiencies in the Quota Count System, the scope for the detrimental impact of night-time flying on Thanet’s Tourism Industry and the relevance of Section 8 of the Human Rights Act.

Leader of Thanet District council, Cllr. Clive Hart, said: “Our public consultation clearly demonstrated that a large number of residents were against the introduction of night-time flying. Having considered the views of local people, the findings of our independent assessment and the proposals themselves, it is clear what our recommendation to Council had to be. We are however, fully supportive of the airport. Encouraging regeneration in Thanet and supporting local businesses is vital to the success of the area, but this can’t come at any cost.”


  1. You seem to have completely missed out the bit that goes . . . . "5.2 Legal
    5.2.1 The Section 106 Agreement made between Thanet District Council and Manston Airport
    do not require Thanet District Council to approve/disprove or give consent for / refuse
    authorisation to the proposed Night time Flying Policy."

  2. The large number of residents referred to by Clive Hart amount to less than two thousand out of a population of 132,000. Some mandate or just pretending you have one?


Please note comments that may be libellous, comments that may be construed as offensive and anonymous derogatory comments about real people will be deleted. Also note the facility to leave anonymous comment will be turned of during periods when I am unable to monitor comment, this will not affect people commenting who are signed on to their blogger accounts.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.