Sunday 23 December 2012

Thanet Independent Leader's Statement about Letters


Due to the press releases recently made by both the Leader of Thanet District Council and Cllr Ian Driver, including the publication of a letter by Cllr Driver , that was originally sent to his independent colleagues, I feel it is in the public interest to publish the following letter sent to Cllr Driver prior to the  retraction of his  statement calling for the Chairman of Thanet District Council to resign.

Dear Ian ,
We are most unhappy, uncomfortable and concerned with your presentations at the Full Council Meeting of TDC 6th December 2012.
We feel that the almost monotonous recurrence of various provocative events, that you engineer, are harmful to our group and personal reputations as well as the stability of our Council in which we play vital roles and owe our loyalty to ensure that normal business is able to continue . Anything less becomes irresponsible.
Earlier in our association, we agreed that any controversial policy statements would be the subject of discussion amongst all three of us prior to any action or publication.
Unfortunately you have not honoured our agreement.
Naturally, this is an unacceptable practice and should it reoccur, you will automatically eliminate yourself from our group.
With best wishes,
We remain,
Sincerely,
Jack Cohen and John Worrow.

43 comments:

  1. But if Ian Driver leaves their 'Group' then they effectively cease to exist as a recognised poltical unit and with it, I suspect the benefits that go with it!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cllr King, led a group of three. When one of them left the group, Cllr King and the remaining member kept seats on committees and Cllr King continues to enjoy the same privileges as the other three leaders. But Simon knows this really, he just thinks that he can pull the wool over the eyes of voter. But as we recently saw in the Westgate-On-Sea by-election, people have more sense then Simon gives them credit for, and they now take what he says with a pinch of salt!

      Delete
    2. If Tom King would have voted with us instead of sitting on his hands, and if Simon would have attended the meeting, the balance of power would have not changed, and we would still be in power instead of Labour.

      Delete
    3. Even for TDC this is a laughable press release: "Independents Group decide to be Independent"? What a waste of the rates.

      What exactly has TDC and this Group achieved this year, we seem to have a Buggins Turn of bickering numpties being snidey to each other. At least the civil servants are lavishly paid to put up with this idiocy.

      Delete
    4. I agree rules are a waste of time and as for racism and homophobia it should be legal

      Delete
  2. Cllr King has been heard at OSP saying that Ian Driver is joining his group so they can call for a vote of confidence in Clive Hart and replace him with Chris Wells as Council leader.
    If Ian can't work with soft leaders such as Clive and John, how in Gods name is he going to work with Tom King and Chris Wells?
    We need to face the facts, Ian is not a team player, Tom and Chris are about to find this out. But I guess it's up to Ian... he might want to remain a TIG member

    ReplyDelete
  3. Simon, 16.00 or anyone else who knows the answer. What is the position regarding the chair’s vote and the chair’s casting vote in the case of a motion of no confidence in the chair?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's public knowledge now that Tom King was plotting against Jack Cohen and his lack of support over the parking showed that King just had his own agenda

      Delete
  4. Thats true Simon. It would be the same if you left your 'Group' then they effectively cease to exist as a recognised poltical unit and with it, I suspect the shadow cabinets benefits that go with it!

    errrr that can't be right..coz it didnt happen with ex-shadow member Gregory left 'your' group..
    me thinks Simon is being Simon!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ian is not leaving TIG lol

    ReplyDelete
  6. Michael.. good question and I don't know the answer. You would have to look at the constitution.

    In response to 18:27. our familiar Troll I would guess, then thankfully, the Conservative Group have rather more than the three members required to be recognised as a political "Group' with all the titles (Leader) and privileges that go with it. I'm sure that if I were to go, then many readers here would breathe a sigh of relief and celebrate Xmas a day early!

    That said, we presently have a bizarre situation where Leader Cllr Worrow, sits in on the meetings between, Clive, Bob and the Chief Exec and is given equal privilege in all matters political. If that isn't a crazy example of politics gone awry, then tell me what is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cllr King also sits in and is given equal privilege in all matters political. But that is just pretend because Simon says so.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
  7. Michael it is the same as every other committee, it's still about numbers. It makes no difference what group a councillor belongs to, the maths and the casting vote is still the same. Anyway its just Hear-Say, he may remain a TIG member.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yes you are right yet again Simon. A group needs at least three members, in order to be a group.
    Thats why the group that Clls King and Grove have is not really a group - they just pretend!

    errr not so if you look at the council web site... me thinks Simon is being Simon again!

    ReplyDelete
  9. You said it 18:49 - takes three to tango officially in local politics I'm sorry to say but a couple are at liberty to call themselves what they like.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Simon 18.40 You say "That said, we presently have a bizarre situation where Leader Cllr Worrow,sits in on the meetings between, Clive, Bob and the Chief Exec and is given equal privilege in all matters political. If that isn't a crazy example of politics gone awry, then tell me what is.

    How about Nick Clegg sitting in on a meeting with Cameron Osbourne May etc etc ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The the power is having the leadership qualities to do the deals outside of privileged meetings, but if Simon was good it that he would be leading the council and not just telling people what a clever politician he is.

      Delete
    2. but at least Simon doesnt make tpyos, thats whats really important

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
  11. Of course you are right Simon, Cllrs King and Grove do not really belong to a group of two, and their membership of committees is just pretend.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I'm rather inclined to agree with shinguard. On current political form Nigel Farage should be sitting-in but without any MP's Nick Clegg still has the upper hand.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Maybe Sandy and Ken can make a pretend group, not sure about them getting the pretend committees that King and Grove belong to though

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The pretend 0% salary explanation will be interesting too unless we all pretend it isn't done with public officials and funds.

      Delete
  14. Chris Wells will make a good leader though

    ReplyDelete
  15. When anonymous 1903 feels able to join in on a grown-up conversation on the mysteries of local political balance and privilege, let me know but until then I suggest he listens and learns.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Surely if Cllr Moores was that Clever he would of used his leadership qualities to prevent power slipping out of his hands in the first place :) The fact is they lost power because he was not there to vote!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Wrong again I'm afraid. We were already one down in addition to the chair's casting vote. If you recall, there was a mini hurricane running that night and I was stuck, trying to EasyJet back from Amsterdam. Unlike the balance of my Cabinet Labour colleagues, I confess to having a job which occasiionally takes me away from home.

    Curiously though, this thread is wandering off topic as the usal suspect obsesses about me.

    ReplyDelete
  18. At the end of the day you let your party down. How did they stand a chance without your superior intelligence? You really should be an MP.

    ReplyDelete
  19. How about a new year resolution to totally ignore the troll who pops up with his monotonous comments, more anti-Moores than any useful contribution, for all time.

    ReplyDelete
  20. God probably sent the hurricane!

    ReplyDelete
  21. How about a new years resolution to humour so-calledTom Clarke and pretend that it's still the 1970s

    ReplyDelete
  22. Godd idea .. Let's attempt to discuss something rather more interesting than me. In this case, what happens when TIGs fall out?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Just to remind readers that at the council meeting where the switch was made to Labour, Tom Kng's independents, which included Cllrs Worrow and Cohen, agreed to support the Conservatives as they held the balance. Nobody was more surprised, hurt and angry than Tom King at his colleagues when they voted with Labour at the no confidence motion in the Conservatives, ths neatly delivering the Council to Labour and consequently picking up two of the most senior non Cabinet appointments swiftlly afterwards.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bayford broke his agreement over parking with Cohen and homophobia also played its part, together with a 'Let Them Eat Cake' attitude from Bayford, Moores and Gregory.

      Delete
    2. Simon Moores is his egos own worst enemy

      Delete
  24. I bet Cllr Driver is quaking in his boots. He took on Arthur Scargill and his Socialist Workers Party so I suspect that the rump of TIG doesn't greatly scare him. He'll do whatever he thinks is right in his eyes.

    Being threatened by Messrs Worrow and Cohen somehow reminds me of Dennis Healey's comments about Geoffrey Howe.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe twenty first century solutions work better in the twenty first century

      Delete
  25. If Tom King would have voted with us instead of sitting on his hands, and if Simon would have attended the meeting, the balance of power would have not changed, and we would still be in power instead of Labour.

    ReplyDelete
  26. thats a good point. if king was upset as somes pretends he was he would of voted for bayford which of course he did not... bob grove who is known for having very right wing views was the only independent that voted for Bayford

    ReplyDelete
  27. Not quite sure about all this "Simon pretends" bit. I'm only interested on the facts and not hearsay or speculation from people who weren't involved and really don't know what they are talking about. Remember that I know Tom very well indeed as a fellow ward councillor and while I can't speak for him and very much aware of what took place that night, why he "sat on his hands' when he saw the vote would be lost (Chairman's casting vote) and in fact what deals, if any, existed in fact and not the imagination of 21.39. Unfortunately, the weather had other ideas that night, over a year ago now and the press release under discussion her refers to something quite different, as much as you would like to draw the conversation back to me again...

    I'm off to bed, so good night all and a very merry christmas too!

    ReplyDelete

Please note comments that may be libellous, comments that may be construed as offensive and anonymous derogatory comments about real people will be deleted. Also note the facility to leave anonymous comment will be turned of during periods when I am unable to monitor comment, this will not affect people commenting who are signed on to their blogger accounts.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.