Wednesday, 19 March 2014

Manston Airport Closure

Any change at Manston must create sustainable jobs say Greens
Reacting to news that a consultation has begun on the closure of Manston Airport, Green Party Parliamentary Candidates for Thanet North and South Ed Targett and Ian Driver have said that any change of use must drive sustainable jobs for the area.
Thanet Green Party has been calling for years for alternative uses for Manston Airport to be considered with some urgency, being aware that a business haemorrhaging millions was unlikely to survive much longer.
 News that a consultation has begun on its possible closure is of little surprise to any close observer. As we said in 2012, news of new flights to Schiphol was no guarantee that the business would succeed and that the delight of Sir Roger Gale MP and Kent County Council at the deal should be put into perspective.
 Thanet North Green prospective parliamentary candidate Ed Targett said: "It is not nice to see jobs at risk. Even two years ago Manston owners Infratil were already looking at a change of use however in the hope that it would be easier to sell and the business has been on deeply shaky ground. We have long proposed that alternative uses be looked at for Manston, particularly for the possibility of it being converted to a major leisure facility, precisely to create employment and bring in visitors."
 "Those plans were derided as “pie in the sky” by Roger Gale, who asked: “Where would the money come from?”  Perhaps if he and others had not been so single-mindedly fixated on throwing public money at the airport in the hope it would prove to be the economic saviour of East Kent they could have considered the Green Party's suggestions. Meanwhile Gravesend won a £2 billion deal for a major leisure centre anticipated to create 27,000 jobs.
 “What now appears most likely” said  Green Councillor  and prospective parliamentary candidate  for  Thanet South, Ian Driver,  is yet another sprawling housing development  unaffordable for most local residents, with no long-term jobs created. We deeply oppose this prospect. Any Manston development should be aimed at creating jobs, boosting the region’s potential to attract visitors, pragmatic and forward-thinking."
 The coalition government as well as our local councils seem to have no notion of economic regeneration beyond building houses an anything in sight, from prime agricultural land to airports. The Green Party is the only party that has consistently challenged this, spotted the likely closure of the airport and looked at ambitious alternatives that could drive regeneration, bring investment and create sorely needed employment. We will continue to do so. If Manston closes, anything on the site should benefit the whole area, create sustainable local jobs and not just profits for property developers.

6 comments:

  1. So what would you suggest for the site then Ian? Factories? Another shopping centre? Thanet Earth part 2?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Back in August, Driver said "Manston Airport has never been commercially successful. It is extremely unlikely that it ever will be. The Kent Green Party believes that it’s time to consider alternative uses for this site such as commercial, leisure or much needed social housing to provide decent homes for Thanet’s growing population.". He is strongly worded about his Party's objection to housing in the main statement but he didn't feel that way 7 months ago.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. At that time there were no plans to build 800 homes next to the airport (manston green) nor where their plans to build 550 homes at the new haine road site (the EKO application). 1350 home are now planned to be built within a square mile of the airport. I think that this is more than sufficient, especially bearing in mind the traffic chaos and pollution around westwood cross which will be added to by these developments. My position on housing has therefore changed in light of these new developments

      Delete
    2. Ok, but what are your suggestions to "create sustainable local jobs" then?

      Delete
    3. So you generally support building the best part of 2,500 homes in Westwood/Ramsgate, but completely oppose house building in the Manston airport site?

      Delete
  3. The best suggestion was from someone on ECR's site who proposed that the runway be kept so Ian Driver can park all his bandwagons.

    ReplyDelete

Please note comments that may be libellous, comments that may be construed as offensive and anonymous derogatory comments about real people will be deleted. Also note the facility to leave anonymous comment will be turned of during periods when I am unable to monitor comment, this will not affect people commenting who are signed on to their blogger accounts.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.